Bound Witness: Analogies
Last updated
A logistics company uses XYO to ensure that package deliveries are verifiable and tamper-proof. Each delivery vehicle and drop-off location is equipped with XYO-enabled devices that perform Bound Witness interactions during deliveries.
Proof of delivery relies on scanned barcodes or a photo confirmation, both of which can be spoofed or disputed. Trust is placed in centralized systems that can be hacked or manipulated, and verifying disputes requires manual audits.
When a delivery occurs, the truck’s device and the drop-off point’s device cryptographically handshake, mutually recording and signing the event.
This creates a decentralized, tamper-resistant proof that the two devices—and therefore the package—were at the same place and time.
Provides cryptographic proof of real-world interactions
Removes the need for centralized verification authorities
Strengthens trust without exposing sensitive data
An event organizer uses XYO-enabled devices to verify attendance at concerts, conferences, and sports games. Attendees’ phones or badges act as Sentinels that perform Bound Witness interactions with event entry scanners.
Attendance is tracked by scanning QR codes or checking names off a list. This process is vulnerable to human error, ticket fraud, and centralized server failures. Disputes over attendance often require manual reviews or witness testimony.
When an attendee checks in, their device and the event’s device perform a cryptographic handshake, each signing and recording the interaction independently.
This creates a decentralized, verifiable proof that the person physically attended the event.
Creates tamper-resistant attendance records
Reduces fraud by proving proximity without relying on trust
Enables private, decentralized verification for reward programs, NFTs, or certifications
Last updated